Tuesday 28 January 2020

How to Choose Correct Stencils that Suits your PCB Requirements


With all of the stenciling options available to those assembling printed circuit boards, how does one choose the correct stencil for the job at hand?

For the prototype assembler, whether it be at the first prototype or at the beta prototype level, there are numerous stencil options to consider using in lieu of hand soldering. Stencil printing is a faster more consistent assembly operation when there are SMT components as part of your assembly. For very small prototype assembly requirements “foil only” or “prototype” SMT stencil options are appropriate. “Foil only” stenciling options, as the name implies, are those stencils containing only the aperture patterns. These stencils are simply taped off to the printing surface as the underlying PCB patterns are aligned with the corresponding apertures. For large pitches or large printing patterns, these types of stencils are available in Kapton™, Mylar and stainless steel. The plastic film stencils require more finesse and experience in terms of the printing performance whereas the stainless-steel stencil printing process is more forgiving. When too fine of features are used in the plastic film stencils the squeegee pressure can cause smearing underneath the stencil and onto the PCB surface. The stainless-steel stencils are also available in a greater variety of thicknesses. The prototype SMT assembly process presents a variety of options for stencil printing.

For the medium volume producer both “frameless” stencils as well as “framed” stencil options are the most often used stencil types. “Framed” stencils are typically driven by the kind of printer being used to apply solder paste to the PCB. An automatic or semi-automatic stencil printer is configured to accept a given stencil frame size. The outline dimension is what the stencil fabricator needs to know in order to provide the proper SMT framed stencil. “Frameless” stencils come in fewer available sizes but provide the end user with a lower cost alternative which is easier to store and retrieve. “Frameless” SMT stencils also require some setup time compared to their “framed” stencil counterparts. Both of these types of stencils are used in machines that can control many of the input variables to the SMT printing process including squeegee pressure, squeegee angle, stencil separation speed, PCB support, and print stroke takt time. In most cases, the medium volume SMT assembly operation has both a machine to control the printing parameters as well as providing a rigid structure for the PCB to supported and printed repeatably.

For higher run rate PCB assemblies, the framed stencil option is the most common choice amongst stencil types. It provides the choices in sizes; it maintains the rigidity of the structure as well as numerous color and frame material choices. The most rigid frames are made from cast aluminum with lower weight extruded aluminum being an option.

Another item to consider when choosing an SMT stencil supplier is the type of material being used. Tight print tolerances, micro BGAs and other fine-pitched components require the use of high-grade stainless steel. The microstructure of these higher-end stainless foils allows for a smoother release of the solder paste from the walls of the aperture. In addition, higher-grade materials are not as geometrically impacted by the heat produced in the laser cutting process.

Not only should all of the SMT stencil options be considered when choosing the type of stencil to be ordered but having the right experience at your stencil the manufacturer is critical. While the IPC 7525 provides guidance on aperture geometries and standard deductions, a knowledgeable and experienced stencil engineering team will also be an attribute to get a consistent print quality. Choose a supplier who has years of experience will be important in finding “gotchas” in the stencil design.

Tuesday 12 February 2019

IPC A-610 Revision “G” Version


In 2017, the IPC standards committee efforts yielded an updated version of the IPC-A-610 document in the “G” version. This new version was about 3 years in the making from the previous version with work already begin on the newer and yet-to-be-released “H” version.



There were some changes in moving to the new IPC-A-610 G version including but not limited to the following:

It was re-emphasized by the standards committee that the the standard will remains a visual quality acceptance standard.

The IPC-A-610 G version had some updates to terminology and further edification of some terms as well as new terms for the electronics assembly. Some of these changes had to do with making sure that other IPC standards including but not limited to the IPC-TM-50and the the IPC-J-STD-001 standards were brought in line with each other in terms of definitions and meanings.

One of the areas where IPC-A-610 Revision G changes were more significant were the changes to the through hole inspection criteria.Wire wrapping of leads cannot interfere with other leads was added as a criteria. For supported holes the hole fill criteria was “tightened up” when the barrel is connected to a ground plane. Finally, the solder touching the meniscus criteria were also changed in the updated version.

In the SMT section several inspection criteria were amended in IPC-A-610 G version. One of these was adding 2-sided component criteria to the rectangular-shaped components. Flat gull wing lead solder criteria were clarified I the gull wing section of the newest IPC-A-610 G version. The Butt/I terminations section is also filled with some new figures and tables in order to section navigating simpler and it helps to clarify certain inspection criteria in the revised IPC-A-610 G standard. In addition to the above SMT section changes, there is the section in the BGA area tightens up some of the inspection criteria associated with underfill and staking.



Now that IPC-A610 revision G has been out for some time there are several upgrades and extensions being discussed at the committee level with respect to changes being recommended in the “H” version of the document.
The changes in the standards in moving form IPC-A-610 “F” to version “G” were fully discussed about in an online webinar presented by a BEST Master Instructor James Barnhart whose presentation can be found here:

If you are interested in becoming certified at either a technician level (CIS) or instructor level (CIT) for the IPC-A-610 revision G all of the course materials are out. At the CIS level the IPC-A-610 training is modularized with the first two background and terms modules being mandatory with several other “optional” modules. Some of these module topic include through hole, SMT technology, hardware, soldering, high voltage, wireless wrap, component damage and boards. If you are interested in being an IPC-A610 G instructor the class takes place over (4) days including testing and includes coverage of the entire standards document.

The document itself is currently available. It can be purchased from stock here

How to Choose Correct Stencils that Suits your PCB Requirements

With all of the stenciling options available to those assembling printed circuit boards, how does one choose the correct stencil for the ...